New To UFT? Join the best UFT Training Online!

Micro Focus QTP (UFT) Forums › Micro Focus UFT (earlier known as QTP) › UFT / QTP Beginners v
Local and Shared Object Repositiories - Should a Test Have Both?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Local and Shared Object Repositiories - Should a Test Have Both?
basanth27 Offline
Moderator
*****
Posts: 1,003
Threads: 1
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation: 5
#4
Solved: 10 Years, 9 Months, 2 Weeks ago 08-28-2009, 09:43 AM
Vikas -
Export is what you need to do and maybe delete it after that. Merge may show you several conflicts as you move ahead with more and more tests. When you record the objects are by default stored in the Local Repository if you are using QTP 9.2 and above.
Basanth
Give a fish to a man and you feed him for a day..Teach a man how to fish and you feed him for life.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Local and Shared Object Repositiories - Should a Test Have Both? - by basanth27 - 08-28-2009, 09:43 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Updating Shared repository vinod_3466 3 4,271 06-29-2016, 02:16 PM
Last Post: Ankesh
  Local System Monitor kbhargava505 0 2,425 10-16-2015, 12:52 PM
Last Post: kbhargava505
  QTP 11 - CreateFolder fails to create folder in shared network drive from Windows 7 Pallavi 3 3,406 02-25-2014, 02:04 PM
Last Post: guin.anirban
  How to Create and use local repository Sourabh146 2 2,384 01-28-2014, 10:56 PM
Last Post: jacosta
  What is Window Test Object adityasrinivasb 0 2,016 10-23-2013, 12:32 PM
Last Post: adityasrinivasb

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)